10 Reasons Why Cell Phones Should Be Banned From Children

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Cris Rowan| Huff Post

 Male-Fertility-Negatively-Affected-by-Cell-Phones
The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Canadian Society of Pediatrics state infants aged 0-2 years should not have any exposure to technology, 3-5 years be restricted to one hour per day, and 6-18 years restricted to 2 hours per day (AAP 2001/13, CPS 2010). Children and youth use 4-5 times the recommended amount of technology, with serious and often life threatening consequences (Kaiser Foundation 2010, Active Healthy Kids Canada 2012). Handheld devices (cell phones, tablets, electronic games) have dramatically increased the accessibility and usage of technology, especially by very young children (Common Sense Media, 2013). As a pediatric occupational therapist, I’m calling on parents, teachers and governments to ban the use of all handheld devices for children under the age of 12 years. Following are 10 research-based reasons for this ban. Please visit zonein.ca to view the Zone’in Fact Sheet for referenced research.

1. Rapid brain growth
Between 0 and 2 years, infant’s brains triple in size, and continue in a state of rapid development to 21 years of age (Christakis 2011). Early brain development is determined by environmental stimuli, or lack thereof. Stimulation to a developing brain caused by overexposure to technologies (cell phones, internet, iPads, TV), has been shown to be associated with executive functioning and attention deficit, cognitive delays, impaired learning, increased impulsivity and decreased ability to self-regulate, e.g. tantrums (Small 2008, Pagini 2010).

Related Article: The Truthseeker: ‘Unequivocal’ Cell Phones Cause Cancer (VIDEO)

2. Delayed Development
Technology use restricts movement, which can result in delayed development. One in three children now enter school developmentally delayed, negatively impacting literacy and academic achievement (HELP EDI Maps 2013). Movement enhances attention and learning ability (Ratey 2008). Use of technology under the age of 12 years is detrimental to child development and learning (Rowan 2010).

3. Epidemic Obesity
TV and video game use correlates with increased obesity (Tremblay 2005). Children who are allowed a device in their bedrooms have 30% increased incidence of obesity (Feng 2011). One in four Canadian, and one in three U.S. children are obese (Tremblay 2011). 30% of children with obesity will develop diabetes, and obese individuals are at higher risk for early stroke and heart attack, gravely shortening life expectancy (Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2010). Largely due to obesity, 21st century children may be the first generation many of whom will not outlive their parents (Professor Andrew Prentice, BBC News 2002).

Related Article: How To Break Cell Phone Addiction

4. Sleep Deprivation
60% of parents do not supervise their child’s technology usage, and 75% of children are allowed technology in their bedrooms (Kaiser Foundation 2010). 75% of children aged 9 and 10 years are sleep deprived to the extent that their grades are detrimentally impacted (Boston College 2012).

5. Mental Illness
Technology overuse is implicated as a causal factor in rising rates of child depression, anxiety, attachment disorder, attention deficit, autism, bipolar disorder, psychosis and problematic child behavior (Bristol University 2010, Mentzoni 2011, Shin 2011, Liberatore 2011, Robinson 2008). One in six Canadian children have a diagnosed mental illness, many of whom are on dangerous psychotropic medication (Waddell 2007).

Read the rest of the article…

Tags: , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS FeedConnect on YouTube

14 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 10207435625314024@facebook.com' Sandi Ferguson says:

    My child walking home from school alone without a phone? I don’t think so. At a friends house without easy access to me? Nope. Safety first.

  2. 10204934941365137@facebook.com' Otis N. Pete Wilton says:

    How bout people except some personal responsibility and quit trying to fucking BAN everything?

  3. 10206568679670250@facebook.com' Barbra Race Krueger says:

    My boys both got their first cell phone in high school. They were one of 10 out of about 300 in middle school. They turned out just fine!

  4. 1040936259272404@facebook.com' Nohra Ashur says:

    Can I share

  5. 10153472507028323@facebook.com' Vanessa Inman says:

    Mine srent getting one until around 16

  6. 10154357644718032@facebook.com' Amanda Jay says:

    Why anyone is ok with a child having a live device next to their brain that contains harmful toxins is beyond me!. The long term effects have yet to be proven alot more, and if anyone thinks that’s nothing to worry about then carry on frying their brains!. Oh but then a child without a mobile phone!!!!! Oh dear, one cannot have that! The fat cats of the mobile phone industry make sure their own kids don’t have mobiles…..oh why is that I wonder!

  7. 10207435625314024@facebook.com' Sandi Ferguson says:

    I don’t have a landline. So when my kid was home alone, she needed a phone.

  8. 1501017143552052@facebook.com' Vanessa Novak says:

    We all grew up without cell phones and made it through just fine!

  9. 1088400057851538@facebook.com' Xtine Joy says:

    Charie Laguras Cecil Søgaard Chona Laguras Gardose basaha ninjo nah!!!

  10. 10204998919631949@facebook.com' Delis Alms says:

    Did they ever think that 1. ADD/ADHD has been around for a long time, down many generations because it is genetic and that since it was made known that it has become easier to identify? 2. Possibly ADD/ADHD is over diagnosed or misdiagnosed in some?

  11. 851408844957965@facebook.com' Елка Честеменова says:

    da

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend