‘Total Garbage’: Senate GOP’s New Trumpcare Bill Even Worse Than Original

Posted by on July 14, 2017 in Government, Policies, Politics with 0 Comments
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Jake Johnson | Common Dreams

As dozens of protestors led by Reverend William Barber crowded the halls of the Capitol and labeled the GOP’s healthcare agenda “political murder,” Senate Republicans on Thursday unveiled a new version of their Trumpcare plan that one critic mockingly described as “new and improved total garbage.”

“The new Trumpcare bill is awful by design. The tool we have to fight it is simple: public pressure on senators.”
—Ezra Levin, Indivisible
The newly released plan leaves massive and widely condemned Medicaid cuts intact while adding a new amendment—put forth by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas)—that would allow insurers to offer cheap “bare-bones” plans which would wipe out a range of protections for all patients and specifically harm those with preexisting conditions.

Here’s how Buzzfeed‘s Hayes Brown portrayed Cruz’s efforts to “save” his party’s bill:

CNN further noted that keeping the Medicaid cuts in place means “15 million fewer people could insured by the program by 2026” if Trumpcare becomes law.

Aside from the injection of extra funds aimed at appeasing so-called “moderate” Republicans who expressed concern that the bill does not do enough to address the opioid epidemic, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell appears to be committed to keeping the most destructive elements of the bill in place, analysts observed.

One lobbyist told Vox‘s Dylan Scott that McConnell seems intent upon “going right rather than center.”

“I knew this bill was unfixable. What I didn’t count on was that it would get worse.”
—Andy Slavitt, former acting administrator of Medicare and Medicaid

As a result, at least one skeptical Republican Senator—Susan Collins of Maine—has already signaled that she will likely vote against a motion to proceed with the legislation, while several others remain undecided. If the bill is to pass, McConnell can only afford to lose two votes.

“I knew this bill was unfixable,” concluded former acting administrator of Medicare and Medicaid Andy Slavitt. “What I didn’t count on was that it would get worse.”

Resistance groups used the unveiling of Trumpcare’s latest iteration as an opportunity to urge activists to keep up the pressure, and further acts of mass civil disobedience are reportedly being planned.

“Don’t fall for McConnell’s trap. The new Trumpcare bill is awful by design, but it’s not doomed. It’s not the final version,” wrote Ezra Levin, co-executive director of Indivisible. “The tool we have to fight it is simple: public pressure on senators.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who spent this past weekend rallying the Trumpcare oppositionin West Virginia and Kentucky, reiterated a point he has made frequently in recent months.

“Make no mistake about it,” he wrote, “thousands of Americans every year will die unnecessarily if the Republican legislation is passed.”

Topher Spiro, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, marked up Cruz’s amendment to demonstrate how disastrous it would be for consumers.

Read more great articles at Common Dreams.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS FeedConnect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend