DNA Code Can Now Be Modified. Are We One Step Closer to Creating GMO Humans?

Posted by on February 13, 2016 in Medical Advances, Sci-Tech with 31 Comments

thoughtsDNA

By Julie Fidler | Natural Society

Scientists in Britain have recently been given the green light to edit the genes of human embryos for research, leading to fears the practice could lead to “designer babies.”

Chinese scientists set off a firestorm of controversy a year ago when they announced they had begun genetically modifying human embryos. Now, British researcher Kathy Niakan, from London’s Francis Crick Institute has a received a license to carry out similar experiments.

“Our license committee has approved an application by Kathy Niakan of the Francis Crick Institute to renew her laboratory’s research license to include gene editing of embryos,” the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) said in a statement.

Niakan will begin editing embryos using the CRISPR-Cas90 technique, which allows scientists to edit out part of the DNA code so that scientists can see if it was needed. [1]

The embryos must be destroyed within 14 days and can only be used for basic research. [2]

Niakan and her colleagues want to deactivate genes in leftover embryos from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics to find out if it deters development.

About 50% of fertilized eggs do not develop properly and scientists believe that faulty genetic code is to blame. Scientists say that if they could determine which genes are crucial for cell division, it would allow them to screen out embryos with faulty DNA, potentially reducing miscarriages and aiding in fertility.

“We would really like to understand the genes that are needed for an embryo to develop into a healthy baby,” Niakan told a briefing in central London last month.

“Miscarriage and infertility are extremely common but they are not very well understood. We believe that this research could improve our understanding of the very earliest stages of human life. [3]

The initial pilot will include as many as 30 embryos, and the researchers would like to on another 3 genes, which could bring the total to 120. The experiment must first pass an ethics evaluation.

Ethics are at the center of the gene editing controversy and the global outrage that followed the Chinese scientists’ announcement. Critics fear that allowing embryos to be edited could eventually lead to designer babies and genetically modified humans.

A spokesperson for HFEA insists that is not the purpose of her research.

“The committee has added a condition to the license that no research using gene editing may take place until the research has received research ethics approval.

As with all embryos used in research, it is illegal to transfer them to a woman for treatment.”

In November, British scientists were among a group of 150 European experts who called for a worldwide ban on genetic editing of embryos, saying the practice could open the door to “irrevocably altering the human species.”

“Allowing the gene editing of embryos opens the road to genetically modifying all the descendants of a person as well as full blown eugenics which was condemned by all civilized societies after the Second World War,” warned Dr. Calum MacKellar, Director of Research of the Scottish Council on Human Bioethics.

“It is the very future of the way in which societies accept persons with disabilities that is at play since such gene editing procedures infer that they should not have been brought into existence.”

Gene editing may have the potential to eradicate serious diseases, but it also has the potential for unexpected side effects that could damage healthy strands of DNA. Not to mention the unforeseeable consequences of tinkering with the human genetic code in such a direct way.

Even the inventors of CRISPR technology urge caution.

“It is very important to consider the unintended genetic consequences of making an intended change, because there are all sorts of genetic interactions that occur in cells during cellular development — especially in humans, but also other organisms,” said Jennifer Doudna, a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and one of the inventors of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.

Jennifer Doudna speaks on the technology in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdBAHexVYzc

Doudna also attended the November meeting of scientists calling for a ban on human gene editing.

“I think just getting a handle on how a desired change impacts the function and development of an organism or embryo is going to be a big part of this, and it could be decades of work. But this needs to be discussed in the context of this meeting and future meetings so that we can really determine the path forward for gene editing.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS FeedConnect on YouTube

31 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. Anonymous says:

    maybe we need to make some adjustments?

  2. 10156437688845389@facebook.com' Fred Ford says:

    meditation would calibrate everyone, no need since for science to interfere

  3. 964243770307179@facebook.com' Roger Medina Jr. says:

    Dna cannot be altered perfectly. Its is complex and also these experiments won’t function normal. Playing with fire once again…

  4. Anonymous says:

    People are already doing this..

  5. 10153209758102186@facebook.com' Greg Strosnider says:

    Gene therapy is different than the concept of GMO, please stop presenting GMO’s as such and continuing the bias nature.

  6. 240393066292719@facebook.com' Tammy Tyler says:

    I don’t think we should( to both sides of the fence) alter natural evolution. Or God’s creation. Tho you may not believe in God as so many don’t. Mankind needs to believe that there are repercussions for his actions. For those of us that do believe. Where does mankind stop? When they think they have made themselves God?

  7. 1516727841966234@facebook.com' Chris Franklin says:

    Scary…✋✋✋

  8. 10153343299691319@facebook.com' Elizabeth Cudworth says:

    What kind of EGO do you have to have to think you know better than nature?

    • 1744652445755923@facebook.com' Jeffrey Lee Saunders says:

      It’s taking a huge chance that it can be a good idea.Our higher power can take care of that and we shouldn’t mess with it. Thanks

  9. 10153897061068186@facebook.com' Lesley Anne says:

    I think, if this is used as it is intended to be used, it could be a big step forward in helping to eradicate genetically inherited diseases that affect a humans life. I do however, think they are a very long way off being able to do this yet.

  10. 1070361953006041@facebook.com' Adi Toma says:

    OMG 🙁 GMO 🙂

  11. 224250214589730@facebook.com' Patrick Gerald says:

    whomever wrote the headline is a true news person:!- a known fact of life-DNA, 2. Extra, extra, extra- can now me modified(anyone use haircolour, diet/hip replaced/fillings to name a few modifications we see)3. instill curiosity by stating a question containg thed bad acronym of the minute-GMO

  12. 1053105594732370@facebook.com' Bhaskar Chowdhury says:

    All diseases like genetic types will be eliminated & scientists will be worshipped like God

  13. 1744652445755923@facebook.com' Jeffrey Lee Saunders says:

    I think it’s a mistake to alter our DNA.

  14. 827562870687525@facebook.com' Adam Fischer says:

    Slow start for a great cause let alone the same can be done for the living rather simply with today’s technology for everyone faster than you can imagine!!!

  15. 833222280156349@facebook.com' Dalitso Stone says:

    trying to play God??? He’s watching

  16. 10153602110616672@facebook.com' Bob Wert says:

    Pandoras box.

  17. 606533142783310@facebook.com' Buck Rogers says:

    Better hurry the GMO’S have really messed my dna up.

  18. 489963117847871@facebook.com' Clive Powers says:

    GATTICA

  19. 10203579329643906@facebook.com' Vincent Tan says:

    Faith And Fear… Hand In Hand…

  20. 1700769326874004@facebook.com' Santo Mendez says:

    More like . Are we that stupid to creating go humans?

  21. 10208235729986903@facebook.com' Giovanni Aquino says:

    the end of humanity lets take the path beyond technology

  22. 990479284324618@facebook.com' Kevin F. Montague says:

    There is a passage in the Bible Isaiah 65:20 which indicates we will change the DNA code where even childhood will last 100 years. Here is the passage: //// New International Version =
    “Never again will there be in it an infant who lives but a few days, or an old man who does not live out his years; the one who dies at a hundred will be thought a mere child; the one who fails to reach a hundred will be considered accursed.

  23. 193091747714752@facebook.com' Morgan Ledford says:

    Yay more taxes… LOL

  24. 10206045713960306@facebook.com' Thomas Chenhall says:

    Acute Hitlerism.

  25. 10153465800473961@facebook.com' Stephane Chiapello says:

    Let’s manipulate mosquitos genetically so that they can’t reproduce. Job done. Let’s play with embryos now!

  26. 124296954624309@facebook.com' Rudolf Albert says:

    Wow no sickniss but nothing to eat!?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend