Is the U.S. Bullying Other Nations into Geoengineering/Chemtrail Spraying?

Written by on February 7, 2011 in Environmental Hazards with 8 Comments
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Planet Earth

The U.S. thwarted the UN ban on geoengineering because profits are more important than life on this planet.

According to a cable released by Wikileaks, the former United States ambassador to France recommended “moving to retaliation” against France in late 2007 to fight a French ban on Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) corn. Former Ambassador Craig Stapleton (now co-owner of the St. Louis Cardinals baseball team), who was concerned about France’s decision to suspend cultivation of Monsanto’s MON-810 corn, wrote the following to diplomatic colleagues:  “Country team Paris recommends that we calibrate a target retaliation list that causes some pain across the EU since this is a collective responsibility, but that also focuses in part on the worst culprits.”

In late October, 2010, many chemtrail/geoenginnering activists applauded the announcement of a UN ban on Geoengineering.  More than 190 nations agreed to ban geoengineering under a United Nations treaty to protect the diversity of life on Earth. The ban stipulated that “no climate-related geoengineering activities that may affect biodiversity take place, until there is an adequate scientific basis on which to justify such activities and appropriate consideration of the associated risks for the environment and biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural impacts.”

However, there was one big problem: the United States was not one of the signatory countries. In the video below, Sonia of “The Truther Girls” pointed out that the ban was most likely useless without U.S. agreement: “The U.S., when it comes to New World Order, and unfortunately the destruction of our environment, is among those leading the charge.”  Sonia also provided a detailed analysis of the document that apparently was drafted by the U.S. in response to the ban.  She concludes: “It looks to me like the U.S. is trying to think of a way to get the rest of the world on board with the geoengineering program – not to stop it.”

Sure enough, less than six weeks later, the following headline from the Activist Post hit the net: “UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club.” The accompanying article details the events at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Cancun, Mexico: “In Cancun, Mexico, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is under pressure to overturn the UN ban on chemtrails… The US has not agreed to it.  Citing profits, the US further refuses to cut greenhouse gas emissions attributed to global warming, the purported concern of the United Nations. Instead, it seeks to expand its geoengineering projects for which hundreds of patents have already been filed.

Apparently, the ban was either overturned or never implemented. Shortly after the Cancun convention, the spraying intensified worldwide.

How in the world did one single country manage to convince 193 others that profits were more important than protecting life on this planet? Could they have used the same strong-arm tactics that they used against France for non-compliance with their GMO agenda?

Tags: , , , ,


If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on YouTube

8 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1.' ad says:

    the world is ruled by the free masons ande the mossad

  2.' SortingHat says:

    The USA is so messed up that I seriously wonder if it’s time for the UN to just bail America out and take over from there cleaning up the crap.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use' must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.

Send this to friend