Ben & Jerry’s ice cream contains traces of controversial herbicide

Posted by on July 27, 2017 in Food, Drink & Nutrition, Health with 0 Comments
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Katherine Martinko | Treehugger

Ice cream lovers aren’t happy to learn they’re licking glyphosate on hot summer days.

Ice cream maker Ben & Jerry’s is a company accustomed to making headlines for good reasons, such as switching all its sugar, cocoa, vanilla, coffee, and bananas to Fairtrade-certified sources and handing out free scoops from the back of an ice cream-themed Tesla. The latest headline, however, is a departure from the norm and a PR disaster for the company.


Traces of glyphosate, the most widely-used pesticide in the world and a main ingredient in Monsanto’s notorious RoundUp, have been found in 10 out of 11 samples of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream. It’s not a lot, only about 1.74 parts per billion in the highest-measuring Chocolate Fudge Brownie ice cream.

“A 75-pound child would have to consume 145,000 eight-ounce servings a day to hit the limit set by the Environmental Protection Agency [and] an adult would have to eat 290,000 servings to hit the agency’s cutoff,” says the New York Times.

The EPA’s safe limit, however, has been brought into question recently, with an updated conclusion from the World Health Organization’s Agency for Research on Cancer stating this year that glyphosate “probably” could cause some cancers.

Researchers worry that exposure even to small amounts of glyphosate can have a negative impact on the body. When lab rats eat the equivalent of a daily child-sized portion of ice cream, they showed early signs of fatty liver disease within three months and it worsened over time.

Interestingly, the government does not and never has tested for glyphosate. It conducts routine tests on all other kinds of pesticides in food, but glyphosate has always been excluded from the tests. From the Times:

“Megan McSeveney, a spokeswoman for the [Food and Drug Administration], said the methods used in its annual tests cannot detect glyphosate because of its chemical makeup and how it degrades. Available methods of testing, she added, are costly and labor intensive. In 2014, after the Government Accountability Office sharply criticized the agency for failing to test for glyphosate — and also for not disclosing that fact to the public — the Food and Drug Administration said it would cost about $5 million to start such testing.”

Various environmental and consumer advocacy groups have taken matters into their own hands, conducting private tests. The Organic Consumers Association is one such group, leading the charge against Ben & Jerry’s.

Its press release states: “OCA is calling for Ben & Jerry’s, a Vermont-based subsidiary of Unilever, to begin an immediate transition to using only organic ingredients, including milk, in its products or face a national and international consumer boycott.”

Ben & Jerry’s director of social mission, Ron Michalak, says the company works hard to source GMO-free ingredients and that none of its plant-based ingredients come from genetically engineered crops where glyphosate is commonly used. Most likely, the traces come from added-in, pre-made ingredients such as peanut butter, cookie dough, or brownies. Michalak said:

“We’re working to transition away from GMO, as far away as we can get. But then these tests come along, and we need to better understand where the glyphosate they’re finding is coming from. Maybe it’s from something that’s not even in our supply chain, and so we’re missing it.”

READ THE REST OF THIS ARTICLE…

Tags: , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS FeedConnect on YouTube

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend