Oil Industry Illegally Dumps Fracking Wastewater (Project Censored #2)

Posted by on February 17, 2016 in Environment, Environmental Hazards, Farming, Wildlife with 12 Comments
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Carolina de Mello, Steven Feher, Susan Rahman & Kenn Burrows | Project Censored

Fracking-poisons-planet

Editor’s Note: We are almost done with our countdown of the latest Project Censored Top 25. Here is #2. As always, please share with your family and friends these important, largely overlooked stories so that we can all be more well-informed citizens. Thank you.

California state documents obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity in October 2014 revealed that the oil industry had illegally dumped almost three billion gallons of wastewater from fracking (hydraulic fracturing to extract oil and gas) into central California aquifers. According to the Center for Biological Diversity report, the leaking occurred through at least nine injection disposal wells used by the oil industry to dispose of contaminated waste.


The affected aquifers supply water for human consumption and for irrigation of crops for human consumption. The documents also revealed that water supply wells located close to wastewater injection sites were tested and found to have high levels of arsenic, thallium, and nitrates, all toxic chemicals linked to the oil industry’s wastewater.

According to the documents obtained by the Center, the California State Water Resources Control Board admitted that an additional nineteen wells could have been leaking wastewater into protected aquifers. One state agency official claimed that errors in the permitting process for wastewater injection could have occurred in multiple places. Adding to the magnitude of the danger, toxic chemicals such as benzene can migrate into water sources over a period of years, making accurate risk assessment difficult.

previous study by the Center for Biological Diversity showed that “54 percent of California’s 1,553 active and new wastewater injection wells are within 10 miles of a recently active fault (active in the past 200 years).” The findings “raise significant concerns,” this report’s authors wrote, “because the distance from a wastewater injection well to a fault is a key risk factor influencing whether a well may induce an earthquake.” Microseismic activity as a result of underground injection wells has been well documented in other states such as Oklahoma and Texas.

The Center for Biological Diversity report’s revelations about water contamination came amidst legislative deliberation to regulate fracking in California. As both Donny Shaw of MapLight and Dan Bacher for IndyBay reported in May 2014, over the past five years, the oil industry has lobbied powerfully in the California state legislature, spending over sixty-three million dollars in efforts to persuade state policymakers to permit the continuation and expansion of fracking. In May 2014, state senators rejected a fracking moratorium bill, SB 1132. The senators who voted against the moratorium received fourteen times more money in campaign contributions from the oil industry than those who voted for it. Shaw quoted MapLight figures: senators voting “No” on the moratorium bill received, on average, $24,981 from the oil and gas industry, while those who voted “Yes” received just $1,772 on average. “If the five active senators who abstained from voting—all Democrats—voted in favor, the moratorium would have passed.” The Democrats who abstained received, on average, 4.5 times as much money as those who voted “Yes.”

Source:

Dan Bacher, “Massive Dumping of Wastewater into Aquifers Shows Big Oil’s Power in California,” IndyBay, October 11, 2014, http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/10/11/18762739.php.

“California Aquifers Contaminated with Billions of Gallons of Fracking Wastewater,” Russia Today, October 11, 2014, http://rt.com/usa/194620-california-aquifers-fracking-contamination/.

Donny Shaw, “CA Senators Voting NO on Fracking Moratorium Received 14x More from Oil & Gas Industry,” MapLight, June 3, 2014, http://maplight.org/content/ca-senators-voting-no-on-fracking-moratorium-received-14x-more-from-oil-and-gas-industry.

Dan Bacher, “Senators Opposing Fracking Moratorium Received 14x More Money from Big Oil,” IndyBay, June 7, 2014, http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2014/06/07/18757051.php.

[Read more here]

Originally entitled: “#2 Oil Industry Illegally Dumps Fracking Wastewater”

Robert O'Leary 150x150Robert O’Leary, JD BARA, has had an abiding interest in alternative health products & modalities since the early 1970’s & he has seen how they have made people go from lacking health to vibrant health. He became an attorney, singer-songwriter, martial artist & father along the way and brings that experience to his practice as a BioAcoustic Soundhealth Practitioner, under the tutelage of the award-winning founder of BioAcoustic Biology, Sharry Edwards, whose Institute of BioAcoustic Biology has now been serving clients for 30 years with a non-invasive & safe integrative modality that supports the body’s ability to self-heal using the power of the human voice. Robert brings this modality to serve clients in Greater Springfield (MA), New England & “virtually” the world, with his website. He can also be reached at romayasoundhealthandbeauty@gmail.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe now to receive more just like it.

Subscribe via RSS FeedConnect on YouTube

12 Reader Comments

Trackback URL Comments RSS Feed

  1. 392683374254793@facebook.com' Beautiful Tattoo says:

    I promise my grand mother before she died that I will get this page to 50k and in a week can ya please help me because I want to keep my promise please help by liking my page

  2. 10208062889751225@facebook.com' SB Stolley says:

    The people in charge don’t care. THEY DON’T CARE

  3. 10201298601585023@facebook.com' Rex Berrien says:

    I can hardly believe the stupidity of big business in regards to our Country and World.

  4. 10205539238623202@facebook.com' Susan Popovich says:

    All for the almighty profit for the oil companies. Disgusting. Let’s see if they get fined and how much. THEY JUST DON’T CARE!!!

  5. 10153875413422207@facebook.com' Tamara Seyhun says:

    Im shocked when you have state with a vast wildlife, and water shortage! How did anyone let frackers in in the first place???

  6. 589184014572555@facebook.com' Robert Walker says:

    YOU CANT TRUST CORPORATIONS WITH YOUR The Healthier Life

  7. 677161089082794@facebook.com' Dlav Gaucher says:

    Where the is a WILL ….There SURELY is a way..

  8. 10205976995484728@facebook.com' Christopher Curley says:

    Very sad if GWB 2 had given s tax cut for hybrids instead of suv’s in 2002 we would probably have never needed to frack to begin with

  9. 1568812350106163@facebook.com' Marja Olsen says:

    When you look at all the pressure and responsability on the farmers in California re nitrate contamination of the water table and pollution of the atomosphere it just doesn’t add up. Farmers are made to pay thousands annually for manditory testing and held accountable for the water quality even if it may have been caused by practices on ajoining land and forced to document and justify machinery use and taxed heavier for machinery that causes more air pollution. Corporate immunity for some it seems.

  10. 1144380295591536@facebook.com' Edie Davenport says:

    Cool…… Poisonous water to poison our water… how long til all of our bodies of water are contaminated? With No water to drink or grow food how long will it be til everyone on the planet parishes?

  11. 1223411271008274@facebook.com' Linda Jones says:

    Already been done here in north west UK

  12. 10208515261616962@facebook.com' Manbir Singh Dhaliwal says:

    Gurbir Gill

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in an effort to advance the understanding of environmental issues, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law which contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use'...you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. And, if you are a copyright owner who wishes to have your content removed, let us know via the "Contact Us" link at the top of the site, and we will promptly remove it.

The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Conscious Life News assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms.

Paid advertising on Conscious Life News may not represent the views and opinions of this website and its contributors. No endorsement of products and services advertised is either expressed or implied.
Top

Send this to friend